|
ORGANIC EVOLUTION
Series of 4
PowerPoint Presentations
Both evolution and creationism are postions of faith, meaning neither can be empircally proven. That sits well with the word of God since it makes no scientific claims; "Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear." ( Hebrews 11:3)
The problem occurs when evolutionist present their theory as fact. L. Harrison Matthews, FRS, states in his Introduction to Darwin's The Origin of Species: "The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an unproved theory – is it then a science or a faith? Belief in the theory of evolution is thus exactly parallel to belief in special creation – both are concepts which believers know to be true but neither, up to the present, has been capable of proof.” (J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd. London, 1971, p. xi.).
This series on Organic Evolution will expose the evolutionary myth.
|
EVOLUTIONARY ASTRONOMY
Series of 3
PowerPoint Presentations
Earth the Center ~ Series 1 of 3
Mankind as a whole is completely unaware that science has never proven the earth orbits the sun! This is noted by Ernest Mach, the famous 19th-century physicist for whom the term Mach number was named in his honor. He states: "When the mass and resulting cosmic gravitational force of the entire universe is taken into account, geocentricity can explain the movements of the heavenly bodies as well as either the Heliocentric (sun at the center) or acentric (no center) theories."
Evolution Cosmology ~
Series 2 of 3
There are two views regarding creation, the Biblical account and the theory of evolution. The latter proclaims that believing in a Creator is merely a religion, but evolution is science. Let us consider the words of the late eminent astrophysicist Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington: “For the reader resolved to eschew theory and to admit only definite observational facts, all astronomical books are banned. There are no purely observational facts about the heavenly bodies. Astronomical measurements are, without exception, measurements of phenomena occurring in a terrestrial observatory…; it is only by a theory that they are translated into knowledge of a universe outside.”
Star Distances ~ Series 3 of 3
Just as radiometric dating and their supposed great spans of time give organic evolution the appearance of credibility, star distances are the “evidence” that cosmologist rely on to make the universe appear so large that their light could not possibly reach the earth in the 6,000 year biblical time frame. Unfortunately, this often causes the Christian to doubt the reliability of Scripture. However, that which is not generally known is that light has not had enough time since their Big Bang to travel from one side of the visible universe to the other, even in its billions-of-years timeframe.
|
PLATE TECTONIC THEORY
(Pangea Magnetism)
PowerPoint Presentation
Simply stated, Plate tectonics theorizes the seas, continents, mountain ranges and oceanic ridges were created by moving plates on the sea floor over millions of years. However, the facts indicate the above were created rapdily by a catastrophic event such as the flood of Noah which this presentation sets forth.
|
A SPACE MEDIUM FOR LIGHT WAVES - GEOCENTRICISM
(Electron Positron Lattice)
PowerPoint Presentation
Presentation by Floyd Nolen Jones, Th.D., Ph.D. Paleontologist, Regional Geophysicist. titled, A Space Medium for Light Waves – Geocentricism.
Adapted in part from the 1973 Proposed Theory by Dr. Menahem M. Simhony (1922-2015). Polish born, Dr. Simhony was an associate professor of physics from The Hebrew University, Jerusalem. His background was in experimental semiconductor research, particularly in working with crystals.
This theory is based on far better physics/science than that of the Alice-in-wonderland heliocentricity, relativity, big bang, and quantum “theories.” Only algebra 101 is used in the text, but as the subject is fairly technical the reader will encounter repetition of the main points rather than reference to a slide number.
|
